NAKEDAI PRACTICAL RESOURCE
Where Does AI Actually Belong?
Four work decisions before you automate, assist, augment or keep human
The strongest AI strategy is not to put AI everywhere. It is knowing where AI belongs, where it does not and what should remain human.
Map the work before choosing the technology
Use this framework when a team is asking where AI could be added, but the work has not yet been mapped task by task.
A job rarely changes in one neat block. AI usually changes individual tasks, decisions, handovers, evidence and accountability.
That is why the starting question matters.
Do not start with: Where can we put AI?
Start with: Where does AI actually belong in this work?
The four work decisions
Once the work has been mapped, each task or decision can be considered in one of four ways.
1. Automate
Use AI for repetitive, rules-based and checkable work where the output can be verified.
The important point is verification. Automation should not remove the organisation’s ability to check whether the work has been completed correctly.
2. Assist
Use AI to reduce cognitive load through tasks such as summarising, searching, preparing, organising or comparing information.
The technology helps someone complete the work, but it does not take ownership of the decision or its outcome.
3. Augment
Use AI to support skilled judgement by structuring evidence, identifying patterns or presenting relevant information.
A person still considers the evidence, makes the decision and owns the outcome.
4. Keep human
Keep the work human when it involves trust, ethics, relationships, exceptions, reputation, wellbeing or final accountability.
Human judgement is not automatically an inefficiency. In many situations, it is the control the business needs.
When to be careful
-
Do not add AI to a process simply because the technology is available.
-
Do not replace a working process if AI would add complexity without improving the outcome.
-
Do not treat human judgement as an inefficiency when it provides necessary oversight, context or accountability.
-
Do not assume an entire role should be automated because AI can complete one or two of its tasks.
The leadership check
Use these questions with your leadership team before deciding where AI belongs.
If an answer is vague, leave it blank and treat that as useful evidence.
Task or decision
What specific part of the work are we looking at?
Current problem
What is slow, risky, costly, inconsistent or painful today?
AI role
Should this task be automated, assisted, augmented or kept human?
Human accountability
Who checks the work, makes the decision, explains it or owns the outcome?
Do not change if
What would make us leave this process alone for now?
Ownership
Who owns the outcome, adoption, cost and risk?
If the work cannot be mapped clearly
The team should be able to explain the task, the current problem, the proposed role of AI and the human accountability that remains.
If the work cannot be mapped clearly, the project is not ready for approval.
Take a Human Pause first.
